They've used the traditional means - newspaper and television ads - however opponents of the Employee Free Choice Act, also known as the Card Check legislation, are on the ground in Maine convincing Mainers not to vote for the candidates that support the legislation.
The EFCA seeks to make it easier for workers to organize, but has drawn criticism because it takes away the private ballot process in unions.
U.S. Rep. Tom Allen, who is running for Senate, and Chellie Pingree, who is running in the First Congressional District, both support the legislation.
Employee Freedom, the group behind the opposition, has established a volunteer effort in Maine. Tim Miller, communications director for the group, said this is a grassroots effort to inform people about the candidates.
The group’s YouTube channel has four videos of these volunteers approaching Mainers. The first one shows volunteers approaching people in downtown Portland. “Tom Allen and Chellie Pingree want to take away your right to a private ballot, did you know that?” the volunteer asks people.
Another video shows the volunteer approaching Pingree, who tells them the conversation is more complicated than what they are presenting. Another video shows them approaching Maine House Speaker Glenn Cummings.
The volunteer was challenged in another video by House Majority Whip Sean Faircloth, who peppered the volunteer with questions about how the organization is funded.
Allen’s campaign has denounced the ads from Employee Freedom.
"We believe this ad has no place in this campaign, and we denounce it. To accuse hard-working Mainers of being aligned with organized crime and to suggest Congressman Allen is protective of organized crime is not only false and negative, but personally destructive," said Carol Andrews, Allen Campaign communications director, in a recent press release.
Collins has the support of 94% of her party’s voters compared to Allen’s 80% support among Democratic voters. >
To view a larger version of this cartoon, click here. >
I attended my first political "house party" in 1994 when I was a senior in college. It was hosted by one of former U.S. Sen. George ... >
It’s crunch time. Less than 30 days remain until we head to the polls to vote for President down to School Board—unless you’re joining ... >
nonsense
Guess who else is behind EFCA? Obambi himself. Neal Boortz discussed it at length today on his show . . . For Pingree to say it's a "complicated" issue is nonsense. Obambi, Pingree, Allen---what stooges.
No Chellie, It's not complicated
It is a matter of basic rights, whether you vote for a labor boss, or to unionize your workplace it should be done fairly and without interference from anybody else while you are voting.
With EFCA, you take the private ballot away from the worker...the same private ballot that has elected our leaders since our republic was formed. For Chellie Pingree, who once lead common cause, an organization fighting for civil liberties and fighting for fair and democratic elections, it is mind blowing that she would be coming out in favor of such an unfair, and potentially dangerous law.
Chellie Pingree has clearly lost touch with basic American principles, and until Charlie Summers steps up and starts to expose her for what she really is (which truly isn't a whole lot) it makes me extremely scared that she will represent half of my state in Washington. Someone who is willing to break ranks with their own conscience is not someone I want to be making my laws.
Amused
First, can I say how amusing it is to hear Carol Andrews -- an Internet sensation for boxing a camera man up side o' the head -- talk about being "personally destructive"?
But I digress.
Having been an unwilling union member for ten years (as in join the union or you can't work here) I am keenly aware of how they strong arm and bully. Yes, many hardworking Mainers are members of labor unions. Wouldn't it be nice if the union bosses showed them the respect of allowing a secret ballot so that they might determine their own futures without someone looking over their shoulders.
Tom Allen's support of EFCA is another example of his lock-step, 98% party line voting record.
(I listened to him this morning on WGAN and he could not articulate why he supports this bill. That's because the real and only reason he supports it is because the AFL-CIO told him to.)
It's a bad bill. But he knows if he says it out loud, Carol Andrews will smack him.
In agreement
Carol Andrews should really work on getting Tom Allen a message that works, instead of patting him on the behind and saying "great work Tommy, here's your bone for the day"
The messaging for his campaign has been terrible, his constant flow of blunders has been amusing at least, and he continues to choose losing issues to champion.
And by the way, criticizing Susan Collins for not wanting to attend a Town Hall meeting with Tom Allen, well that doesn't really work for me. I wouldn't want to sit in a room with Tom Allen, I'd walk out of there less intelligent than when I walked in. What are they doing to this poor man's campaign? They are making him look like a complete fool.
The ignorance...
of the people who comment here boggles the mind.
The EFCA gives EMPLOYEES more options in the workplace for choosing a union, INCLUDING secret ballot.
The people opposed to to the EFCA are big business and anti-union lobbying groups who have invested millions in keeping blue-collar workers' rights out of the workplace.
Take the time to read and understand a complex issue, before repeating what you hear Rush and Glenn Beck say. Honestly.
It's not only those posting
... who are being "truhty" about this issue! The article itself says:
"because it takes away the private ballot process in unions. "
... which is a flat out lie.
It ADDS an alternative method in ADDITION to private ballot decisions, if that is what people prefer.
You would think that some very basic fact checking would take place before articles get published.
"It ADDS an alternative
"It ADDS an alternative method in ADDITION to private ballot decisions, if that is what people prefer."
Do you really believe that talking point? If you have an election now - RUN BY THE FEDS --where you can vote in PRIVATE. How does making the vote optional ADD to an existing right you already have?
Think about it, you can vote now in private but if the bill passes that vote will be an option.
And you think that is a good thing?
wow, the "cranky" people are a little jaded
I am so glad that unions will give the "option" of a private ballot to it's workers.
I'll tell you what, I'll give you the "option" of voting for Tom Allen - which you obviously are going to do, which I find mind-boggling in the first place- and I'll have your boss (if you work) hover over your shoulder telling you that if you vote for Tom Allen instead of Susan Collins you will all of a sudden start working the third shift.
How great is that option? Why don't we have the union boss come to the polling place with all of your personal information letting you know just who is in charge, and it isn't you.
It may be complicated as an issue, because it was made complicated purposely so that the real facts get lost in talking points - which you seem to yourselves got lost in.
please
What next? Everyone guilty until proven innocent? C'mon! The one "option" I want from Tom Allen I'll continue to take---a 180 whenever my dear rep is on the premises.
Card Check
portlandobsvr:
In fact, card check was ruled constitutional in 1969. The EFCA doesn't add any new way for employees to form a union, but what it does do is removes an impediment that employERs now have a right to use.
Currently, employERs can demand a secret ballot vote if card check is used to form a union. The EFCA removes that right, and then adds that employEEs who do NOT want to form a union can collect signatures of just 30% of their mates to force a secret ballot vote.
If you still think the EFCA is anti-union, then check out who is funding these groups opposing it; begin with Richard Berman.
Dear Anonymous2
It seems like you have no idea what the EFCA is about. It has NOTHING to do with your voting rights for public officials. Don't try to muddle the facts by confusing yourself.
The EFCA gives employEEs more rights. It's very simple in that regard. If you don't like unions, that's your choice and you can be against it. But if you believe in the worker's right to choose (or opt out of) a union, be either by 50%+1 or secret ballot, then you should to support the EFCA.
the Employee "Free Choice"
the Employee "Free Choice" Act is very simple: it takes away 70 years of standards for privacy and democracy when voting to form a union. What the EFCA law will do is instead of having a private vote it will allow the union bosses to coerce workers into something they may not feel comfortable doing.
Politicians want to be elected by a secret ballot and are always bringing up democracy but when it's it comes to unions they rather accept campaign donations from the AFL-CIO than do what is right for their constituents.
Spouting the same pro-business
talking points. It's almost like it's the same 2 people commenting.
The current system is flawed. And if you think it isn't, it's probably because a union has successfully negotiated a contract at your workplace. But one out of three unions HAVE NOT negotiated a contract.
EFCA will force employers to sit down and work one out.
All this talk about big, bad union bosses is a smoke screen. Without free choice in the work place to form a union (which is NOT available under current law), the big, bad corporation will continue to steam-roll the blue-collar worker.
Remember that when all of you shop at Wal-Mart. Those folks haven't been able to see a union, and under current law, they never will.
Walmart?
Wal-Mart employees do not NEED a UNION (I know how to use caps lock too) They have arguably the best benefits package of any retailer in history.
You are not talking about big-bad corporations, you are talking about small business owners who will be forced out of business because they can't afford what the little unions (like the AFL-CIO...or it's multiple components) strong arm them into paying.
So, I work for a small family landscaping company. Which labor group do you work for "Anonymous"? Because the only people who would support EFCA are the little minions of the white-collars in labor union offices who don't care one bit about what the real blue collar workers are getting paid as long as they can keep their executive pay and influence in the capitals of our country.
Employee Free Choice? They are making it theoretically easier for employees to force a secret ballot...but how much pressure will be placed on all of the employEEs to not sign that petition to force a secret ballot. And if you think there won't be that much pressure placed on workers who are against unionizing...you have your head deep in the sand.
To anonymous 1...with love anonymous 2
I never said EFCA was about electing public officials...but the public officials who are supporting EFCA would cry foul...and go to war, if their opponents proposed any restrictions on private ballots, or the opening of any window to the influencing of voters decisions on what to vote for (or against).
It is not fair to the 30% of people who sign the petition to throw them at the mercy of the co-workers who want to unionize. You are asking too much of humanity to think that they would just simply let them get their petitions signed. Just look at the Beverage Tax issue, the opposition to the People's veto were forced to deal with signature blockers. If the people who signed those petitions were forced to work with the signature blockers day after day, do you think they'd honestly sign?
According to an Employee
According to an Employee Freedom Action Committee survey 92% of Maine respondents believe that employees should have the right to vote on forming a union by an election where each individual’s vote is kept private (http://laborpains.org/?p=837).
The people of Maine are right on this issue. It is time the out of touch politicians wake up and stop putting the union bosses over the workers they represent.
You mean....
the same sham Employee Freedom Action Committee 501(c)(4) "headquartered" in the office of pro-big-business lobbyist Richard Berman? The same Richard Berman who has a history of setting up sham anti-labor "non-profits"? The same Richard Berman who has received funding from big tobacco to advertise pro-business, anti-consumer propaganda?
Maine people don't want a pro-business, anti-labor Washington lobbyist and his minions harassing Maine people.
Do you really believe that
Do you really believe that union membership is down so much because of the part where people get to vote in private?
I'm sorry you don;t like Mr. Berman--or whoever is funding him. I don;t like George Soros who is anti-american and funds the left. I don;t like move-on.org that spent millions of dollars attacking COllins last summer. I don't like the unions in Maine that used taxpayer dollars to fight TABOR.
I don't like the endless front groups spending billions on TV ads pretending Americans want government run health care.
But at the end of the day - the fact that one group thinks that having a vote should be optional in America is even worse.
To portlandobsvr
Yet again, a smoke screen on this issue. The EFCA does not take away any voting ability by employees. In fact, it gives employees more choices.
But to the issue of funding- it is paramount that the people of Maine understand what vested interests are in the political or monetary motivations of misleading advertisers and propagandists. Who funds Rick Berman and what they stand to gain from this deception should be of utmost importance in this argument. Unfortunately, 501(c)(4)'s don't have to disclose their funding sources. And there's a reason why big business is scared to death of this legislation.
OK--I get that you want to
OK--I get that you want to change the subject and talk about the evil corporatist doing all that corporating, but you have to be kidding.
Right now--you sign cards --you get 50% of the cards signed--you have a vote. the vote is run by the feds and you get to decide all by yourself--in a voting booth --if you really think it is a good idea. Sounds good to me.
EFCA MAKES PRIVATE VOTING OPTIONAL. Stop avoiding that fact. Once people understand that --they think it is a bad idea.
What you're conceeding now
is that the EFCA does in fact allow for a private vote. There is no ban on private voting, as the big bad corporatists want you to believe. Employees have a right to a private ballot. Period.
The bigger concern is that big corporations, funding an anti-labor lobbying firm, are misleading Maine people with fear and deception. They are trying to scare Maine people with a dishonest half-truth, and leaving out the reason why big business is afraid of this legislation: employees will have far more rights than ever in the history of this country.
I urge anyone to read this bill and understand the numerous positive benefits it will give to the American worker.
oooo the big bad corporations
The last I checked we were a free market economy driven by capitalism. Instead of worrying about that extra $.25 per hour you may get by unionizing why don't you throw away your Nike shoes, or most of your clothing because they were made by indentured servants, and child laborers in sweat shops making less than what you make inhaling and exhaling once on the job site.
Cry me a river Anonymous1, you are having a hard time coming to grips with reality. It's not about big corporations, it's not about the Wal-Marts (one of the nations largest employers), it's not about the mean capitalists like Gates. What this issue boils down to is the fact that Unions want to limit the obstacles to forcing laborers to organize and hand over even more of their paychecks to the Union machines.
You are missing the point, when private ballots are an option instead of the only option, it is not a truly democratic process. No matter what you say to try to pin the majority of Mainers against you down, you are going to end up on the wrong side of this issue.
So your argument now...
is that unions themselves are the inherent evil in the whole equation? You really painted your whole movement into the obvious corner: that unions, not the manner in which employees choose unions, are the problem.
People of Maine, the choice is obvious. Anti-union groups and their apologists will not stop until you don't have a choice in choosing a union to represent you. It will be the 19th century all over again. Be sure to read Upton Sinclair's The Jungle to remind yourself of what our forefathers had to fight against.
Ridiculous
I'd just like to point out Aisle 12's comment, which is one of the funniest I've ever read on this site:
Wow. Just.... Wow.
Seriously who do you work
Seriously who do you work for? Because if you were a Maine citizen, you wouldn't even be arguing with me.
And yes, I am arguing that big labor is the perpetrator of injustice more than anything in this equation. It is important to point out that our "forefathers" were up against more than your everyday worker today. They were battling more injustice than you will ever deal with in your entire life anonymous1. Don't finish an argument by comparing an apple to a piece of steak. It doesn't add up. You are talking about your forefathers? This is a class of people who worked 80 hours a week, for next to nothing and never complained about it. They needed somebody to stand up for them.
Today, if you get a hangnail on the job site, the union will get involved and fight management to make this "injustice" right. Unions are becoming obsolete and your solution to the entire problem is to make it easier for union thugs to influence workers who don't really need to unionize to vote to form a union. The Jungle is a great book, but if you really want to read what happens inside unions read "Betrayal" by Linda Chavez. A little corruption tends to destroy a pro-union argument I would say.
Secret ballot voting
portlandobsvr:
You obviously do not know what changes the EFCA would bring.
As I wrote, currently it is the employER that has a right to demand a secret ballot vote, not employEEs. Card check is just one of three ways that a union can be formed that must be recognized by management (a secret ballot and a successful strike are the two others). When 50% plus one union cards are signed, a vote is NOT automatic as you write.
The EFCA would take away the right of an employER to demand a vote, and instead allow employEEs who gather signaures of just 30% of their workmates to demand a secret ballot vote. These signatures would, at the same time, invalidate a union card signed by an employee.
The opposition to the EFCA is from businesses, because it makes it easier for a union to be formed. Of course Mainers think that a secret ballot vote is a good thing - but as I've made clear, it will be employEEs who will be able to force such a vote under EFCA.
Ad
One of my favorite union ads http://www.unionfacts.com/ads/images/ad_chainfence.large.jpg:
The New Union Label: Closed
Brought to you by the union "leaders" who helped bankrupt steel, auto and airline companies.
The unions say they are an asset to America but they have helped in destroying the very industries we used to be leaders in around the world. With their outrageous benefit packages that let them retire early and live off of a company trying to compete in a global economy and their lazy attitudes care more about the union than the company they work for. As long as the union has money pouring in and they only have to work 8 hours with a 1 hour break, 2 weeks vacation and a medical plan that would make any middle class worker jealous, they could care less if the company they are bankrupting survives.
Unions have become the epitome of what is wrong in the USA. They are thugs and have worked tirelessly to work less in the workplace. If they aren't getting paid upper management salary for low level GED work they strike. If they have to put their own money into a health plan or a retirement package, GOD FORBID. They will strike and cost their company millions just like little babies cry until their parents give them what they want.
More and more people realize the harm unions have done and want to have the freedom to hold their destiny in their hands. That's why year after year union membership has declined and coincidentally the income of people has increased. The old industries like auto, steel, airlines, etc are in decline because they can't get out of their old union contracts. So while the current union thugs are taking from one hand the retired men and women are taking from the other. The companies can barely survive in this global economy.
Thanks for everything, union thugs.
Gerald - Gee thanks.
Gerald -
Gee thanks. So--since the EMPLOYERS actually provide the jobs--I guess it makes sense that they get to play no role--just do what the union bosses want.
Your double speak is silly--you have grown accustomed to swimming in your own bath water and think your declarations make it so.
Let's review the law as it stands - -
Step 1. The good folks toiling in the fields decide they want union representation.
Step 2. They go around and ask folks to sign a card and then collect the cards.
Step 3. The employer looks at the cards and says--geez - I guess they can have a union OR the employer can say--ok--let's see if that's true --we will have a vote--run by the feds.
The system now--gives both parties rights and responsibilities. EFCA shifts the balance of power to the advantage of one over the other.
It is a radical departure from the current system. It strips a fundamental right of a private ballot, to one that is optional at the discretion of only one party. The shift in the balance of power with EFCA will be a disaster for the economy.
This is where the godly unions place your dues
Health Coverage for Maine reported raising $25,105 in the latest reporting period, $25,000 of which came from the Service Employees International Union in Washington, D.C.
-Lewiston Sun Journal 7/25/08
Wow, is this what we need unions for? To fight the 90,000 Maine residents who signed a petition to repeal an 11th hour tax that was passed without any public hearing? 90,000 residents signed that petition, and your labor dues are not going to help you out in your workplace, they are fighting the will of Maine residents.
Is this what our forefathers would have wanted?
Perfect
The people of Maine, and the people of every state that this sham, misnamed Employee Freedom Action Committee is targeting should read this discussion. Their argument has been broken down:
1) EFCA is bad; it takes away employees right for a secret ballot.
2) Ok, it doesn't *really* take away a secret ballot, but workers don't need unions anyway, because corporations, like Wal-Mart, treat their workers so well.
3) Unions are out-dated and unnecessary, so there's no reason to pass this law.
4) Union bosses are the problem, because all they want is your money.
5) You need to feel sorry for corporations because they are going bankrupt because of unions.
Honestly folks, you are flailing here. The unprecedented rights workers will receive with this legislation is scaring big business because workers will not be allowed to be pushed around anymore.
He wants your money too
Anonymous 1 seems to have missed the fact that union dues are not going to help workers gain rights in the work place, nationwide the money is going to support politicians who keep funding the union machine with your tax dollars.
Now his employER, big labor, wants you to believe that you are less American if you are against unions. I don't know any person who is against workers rights. I don't know any person who is against fair labor practices. The people I know, and the people that live in MY state, are against corruption (which riddles most unions) and are sick and tired of seeing the money that they earn going to places it should never go to.
It is a farce that union members are FORCED to pay dues and that their unions spend workers money on everything but promoting fair labor and workplace rights.
All of our jobs have been outsourced overseas because of the high cost of production and the profit margin continuously shrinks. Technology, Manufacturing, even our agriculture is continuously forced to do business in other countries. These are the jobs that Americans have created for themselves and forced out by the unreasonable demands and incredible pressure placed on them by big labor.
In the spirit of full disclosure
I will say this- I have been a Maine citizen my whole life. I do not work for a union, nor am I member of a union, however I wouldn't mind being part of one. I grew up in a union household, and most of my family continues to be part of a union. My family, the union members, fully support paying their fair share to a union to gain the needed collective bargaining against what can be a sometimes tyrannical workplace. They are not anti-corporate, but they are pro-worker. I personally have no vested interest in this argument except to expose the falsehoods and bias in your statements.
I figure "big labor" doesn't have the time to troll through little-read comment postings on this site.
Anonymous 1 -
stop your damn whining. You can't defend what you don't know. Maybe you need to get a real life job and see what it is like to be in the real world. In the real world we work hard for our success and union or not, we do not need our right to privacy violated to get ahead.
I am hoping you take a look at the Sunday newspaper and read the classifieds instead of trying to defend something you know nothing about.
I don't need a union. I
I don't need a union. I don't need to vote for one. I'm not against one or for one. I'm not intimidated by any "union thug boss". I don't care about "big business" or "small business". I'm my own person, and if I don't like working for you, I quit. If I don't like the conditions, I quit. I've always had a job, and I always will, 'cause I work, and I work damn hard. And big business, or small, you will always need me. If I work for you and you get out of line, I poke you in the nose, then quit. You don't own me. If I want to vote secretly or publicly, I will do so. What is everyone so afaid of? Remember. We have the 2nd amendment if things go too far. In the words of your beloved bush, " bring it on"!
Post new comment