A group of veterans, including a prisoner of war with Presidential candidate John McCain and a counterterrorism expert, will tour the state tomorrow (Thursday).
The Republican Party did not provide further details, however the name of the tour, “Not Ready to Lead” implies that they might be sending a negative message of Democratic candidate Barack Obama.
There will be three press conferences Thursday in South Portland, Lewiston and Bangor with the following individuals:
Of course, it is ridiculous that the State's top law enforcement job is settled behind the scenes by a few politicians with no ability for the ... >
To view a larger version of this cartoon, click here. >
While the balloons, confetti and tears of adulation from the election night hoopla have long been swept away, there’s still one race left to ... >
Republicans across Maine were decimated on Election Day. Two incumbent Republican state senators were knocked off, and Democrats picked up additional ... >
Probably a negative message
Probably a negative message about Barack Obama, not of Barack Obama. Seriously, did you go to high school?
Easy, Patriot
There's no need to be rude. Point out what you think needs correcting in a polite way and I'm sure you're more likely to see it corrected.
Also, the fact that McCain's new surge of energy in Maine is going to be dedicated to tearing his opponent down instead of propping his own sagging image up tells you all you need to know about McCain-Palin. When their backs are against the wall, they'll just get nastier.
McCain-Palin: Drink your Hater-ade!
@ PatrioticDelegate 5 a:
@ PatrioticDelegate
5 a: relating to : about b: in respect to
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/of%5B1%5D
Copying and pasting from a
Copying and pasting from a dictionary does not prove anything. Definition is not usage. Make a point next time you post, please.
Here are some actual useful
Here are some actual useful examples that will clear up the confusion. Notice I did more than copy and paste a useless definition.
Message of concern.
Letter of support.
Promise of peace.
Ad about national security.
Speech about the economy.
Letter about the environment.
Where grammar is equal, the determining factor should be readability. This demands that one construct sentences in both the proper, and usual, form. So, while 'of' may or may not be correct, writing 'about' certainly makes more sense and is more easily understood by the vast majority of people.
And what does your personal
And what does your personal vendetta on grammar accomplish? Is correct grammar more patriotic then actually engaging in a discussion about the issues?
Attempts to divert or discredit reporting with unrelated complaints and petty grammatical issues are the tools of those wish to undermine the democratic process. As American citizens, we all have and should exercise the right to vote. That requires education and discussion of the issues and your actions which hinder that are quite UNpatriotic.
I will no longer feed this flame of this diversion.
Only sellouts...
Only vets who are sellouts (like Adam Cote) would support Obama...selling out their brothers and country
Hey NavyVet, care to cite
Hey NavyVet, care to cite some supporting references or are we to take an anonymous posters words as automatic truth?
11:1 Obama voted to support the troops
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/the_truth_on_troop_support.html
McCain I know voted at least once against them too because he didn't like a "timetable". Take note that right now Iraq is calling for such a timetable.
Also according to you most of the active troops deployed abroad must be sellouts too because they have donated six times more to Obama than McCain and Paul?
http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/08/troops-deployed-abroad-give-61.h...
Hey Blah
Google the latest Military Times poll...active duty, reserve, and retired military support McCain at a rate of about 70%. Even Hispanic military are supporting McCain at around 70%...the only military catagory that goes for Obama is African American...it's sad to see blacks put racial identity ahead of the country
"Military Times began with a
"Military Times began with a list of more than 80,000 subscribers and former subscribers to Army Times, Navy Times, Marine Corps Times and Air Force Times who gave the papers their e-mail addresses."
http://www.militarytimes.com/news/2008/10/military_poll_methodology_1006...
It does not take a rocket scientist to know the poll is not representative of the opinions of the military as a whole. The group surveyed is older, more senior in rank and less ethnically diverse than the overall armed services. Plus you had to subscribe to the paper!
While the Huffington Post is generally more left leaning they do make a point about the validity of the Military Times poll.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/diane-tucker/younger-military-families_b_1...
Searching online also revealed a little bit more about McCain's voting record.
He voted against extra funding for the Department of Veteran Affairs for Medical Services for outpatient care and treatment for veterans.
Voted against the creation of a reserve fund to allow for an increase in Veterans' medical care by $1.8 billion by eliminating abusive tax loopholes.
Here is a pretty damning collection of even more votes and actions I found. There are links provided to the actual bills and votes so you are welcome to read them and decide for yourself. Honestly I only had time to follow about 3 of them but they check out.
"Barack Obama outscored his
"Barack Obama outscored his Republican rival, Vietnam veteran John McCain, in a report card issued by an influential, nonpartisan veterans’ group.
The Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA’s) Action Fund gave the Arizona senator a “D” as part of its congressional report card. Obama received a “B” from the group."
http://thehill.com/campaign-2008/obama-outscores-mccain-in--veterans-gro...
Maybe not all Vets agree with you Navy Vet?
Post new comment