In the field of psychology, the “recency effect” refers to the tendency for a person to more easily recall items at the end of a list than those in the middle of the list. If that’s the case, then the State of Maine should be on the minds of readers of Forbes Magazine.
On Forbes’ annual Best States for Business list, Maine ranked in the bottom five at number 46. Only Michigan, Alaska, Louisiana and West Virginia fared worse, in that order. Virginia, Utah and Washington ranked first, second and third, respectively.
With the exception of our neighbor, New Hampshire, which ranked 20, every other New England State was in the bottom half of Forbes’ list. Connecticut ranked at 33, Massachusetts and Vermont tied for 36, and Rhode Island came in one spot above Maine at 45.
Forbes ranks the states based on six indicators: business costs, labor, regulatory environment, economic climate, growth prospects and quality of life. Although Maine ranked fairly high for quality of life, low scores on the other 5 indicators made it clear that 45 other states in the country were more business friendly.
For years, elected officials have been scratching their heads, trying to find a silver bullet to dramatically improve Maine’s business climate. Pine Tree Zones, Research and Development bonds, and task forces have been created in an attempt to stimulate Maine’s business environment. Success has clearly been limited.
Maybe it’s time for a new strategy…
For a state...
with the ruling party against the second amendment they are doing one hell of a lot of searching for silver bullets.
One for tax relief
One for energy reform
One for economic improvement
One for Business development
If they spent less time looking for the quick fix and instead looking for the best solution we'd all be better off.
Criteria?
So how did they measure all of those factors, Wally? "Regulatory environment" is pretty vague, isn't it?
Be an active reader
Click the link and read the coverage for yourself. Should he feed you your mashed potatoes too?
How'd you know I eat mashed potatoes for breakfast?
I think, since Wally is the one pointing to this study and at the very least implying that it is a) accurate and b) significant, then Wally should make some effort to back up its claims.
My guess is that the "regulatory environment" criterion is based on the presence of specific types of consumer and worker protections. Maine has a lot more of those kinds of laws than other states.
But making the logical leap that those are a) automatically bad for business or b) that the "negative" aspects of those regulations outweigh the positive impacts they have on communities in Maine is subjective. Just because someone puts these things in a numbered list doesn't mean they are quantifiable.
Kind of like the ridiculous MERI ratings that Republicans flog on their palmcards every two years.
Post new comment